Justice
Website Design, Content and the Reports © April 2, 2002 by
Eric Krause, Krause House Info-Research
Solutions (© 1996)
Researching the Fortress of Louisbourg National Historic Site of
Canada The Administration Of Justice At The Fortress Of Louisbourg (1713-1758)
1720
When charges were pressed against the soldier the commissaire-ordonnateur felt that leniency should be shown because this was the man's first offence and he was drunk at the time. However, La Brie further complicated the situation by escaping from custody after stealing from a comrade imprisoned for drunkenness. When recaptured, an "ecu" La Brie was sentenced to be shot. De Mézy claimed that there was "a good deal of pique" involved in the verdict since four of the seven judges were related to the treasurer and two of the four witnesses were in his employ. Again the Conseil de Marine approved the sentence, observing that the accused had been on duty when he committed the crime, a time when he was not supposed to be hampered by drink from performing his duties. Also, his escape from prison had made him a deserter. [Source: Margaret Fortier, Fortress Security and Military Justice at Louisbourg, 1720-45, Unpublished Report H E 14 (Fortress of Louisbourg, 1980), pp. 69-70] Summarized
Court Cases, |